Details
-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Critical
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Epic Link:
Description
+ Some users have reported that the methods reports surfaces with a hole, while their own routines say that the surface is intact.
+ Run this method using different matrices.
+ Cross-validate results with other tools (eg, MeshLab) --> uses OFF formal
+ CGAL?